Process Smells in Practice: An Evaluative Case Study
Context Software development comprises many processes, including Code Review (CR) and Bug Tracking (BT). Although no perfect practices exist, recognizing bad practices helps avoid detrimental habits in CR and BT.
Objectives This study investigates CR and BT process smells in industrial settings using Smellyzer, a detection tool based on established smell taxonomies. We aimed to explore the challenges, insights, and outcomes of applying a smell detection tool in real-world software projects.
Method We conducted an evaluative case study involving a large-scale proprietary company, analyzing CR and BT smells in a large software project using Smellyzer. We collected data through pre-surveys, focus groups, questionnaires, follow-up study and tool-based analyses, and then analyzed these data using triangulation and grounded theory methods.
Results Practitioners confirmed the presence of CR and BT smells in their workflows and provided detailed feedback on root causes and their impacts on development efficiency. They also rated the tool’s usefulness at identifying CR smells as 5 out of 5 and BT smells as 4.6 out of 5. Its practicality, measured by the System Usability Scale, scored 77.5 for CR and 80.0 for BT smell detection.
Conclusions This study highlights the presence of CR and BT smells in industrial settings and their potential to affect workflow efficiency and software quality. While our tool, Smellyzer, proved effective in identifying these smells, the findings emphasize the importance of integrating theoretical frameworks with practical solutions. Future work should explore these smells across diverse project contexts and investigate their influence on development practices over time.
Mon 13 AprDisplayed time zone: Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil change
16:00 - 17:40 | Gal CostaTechnical Papers / TechDebt Program / Journal First / Industry Track at Oceania VII Chair(s): Roberto Verdecchia University of Florence | ||
16:00 20mTalk | Reframing Technical Debt TechDebt Program | ||
16:20 20mTalk | MANA-RTD: A Structured Process for Managing Requirements Technical Debt in Real Projects Technical Papers Rhenara Alves Oliveira Federal University of Ceara (UFC), Anna Beatriz Marques Federal University of Ceará, Brazil, Amanda Sousa Federal University of Ceara (UFC), José Antônio Macêdo Federal University of Ceara (UFC), Rossana Andrade Federal University of Ceará | ||
16:40 10mTalk | Technical Lag as Latent Technical Debt: A Rapid Review Technical Papers | ||
16:50 10mOther | Process Smells in Practice: An Evaluative Case Study Journal First A: Eray Tüzün Bilkent University, A: Erdem Tuna Bilkent University, A: Emre Sülün Bilkent University | ||
17:00 20mIndustry talk | LLMs-Assisted Context-Aware Static Analysis for Security Debt Detection Industry Track | ||
17:20 10mDay closing | Closing and TechDebt 2027 TechDebt Program A: Rodrigo Spinola Virginia Commonwealth University, A: Carolyn Seaman University of Maryland Baltimore County, A: Jeffrey C. Carver University of Alabama | ||