Behind the Quantum Curtain: A practical comparison between SVM and QSVM in OT Anomaly Detection
The advent of quantum computing has stimulated research into quantum-enhanced classifiers, promising significant improvements over classical counterparts. Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVMs), can provide quantum speedups potentially useful for cybersecurity applications such as anomaly detection in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs). However, practical assessments on operational data reveal significant challenges. This paper compares QSVM with classical SVM classifiers using real-world Operational Technology (OT) traffic data to explore whether quantum-enhanced models can approximate or potentially match the performance of classical machine learning algorithms that are already well-established and widely adopted for this use case. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that Classical SVMs achieved 98% accuracy when trained on the full OT network traffic dataset. Due to current quantum kernel limitations, the QSVM was restricted to a reduced dataset of samples with 5000 for training and 2500 for testing, attaining an accuracy of 89%. Notably, a classical SVM trained on the same subset reached only 78%. This comparative analysis reveals important insights into the readiness of quantum-based methods for real-world cybersecurity applications and highlights directions for future research. While current hardware constraints prevent fully exploiting quantum speedup, the QSVM’s superior performance on reduced data is a promising indicator of its potential. Nevertheless, classical approaches currently remain the most practical and effective solution for anomaly detection in large-scale OT environments.
Sat 18 AprDisplayed time zone: Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil change
09:00 - 10:30 | |||
09:00 5mDay opening | Workshop Opening EnCyCriS Coralie Esnoul Institute For Energy Technology (IFE) | ||
09:05 15mFull-paper | Towards a Cognitive-Support Tool for Threat Hunters EnCyCriS Alessandra Maciel Paz Milani University of Victoria, Norman Anderson University of Victoria, Margaret-Anne Storey University of Victoria Pre-print | ||
09:20 15mFull-paper | Reflections and Factors in Applying Threat Modelling Tools for Cybersecurity Certification in Critical Infrastructure EnCyCriS Ahmed Amro Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Vasileios Gkioulos NTNU, Claudia Lutze Hitachi Rail, Jean-Marie Lauranson Hitachi Rail, Maria I. Maslioukova Catalink, Pavlos Kosmides Catalink, Christina Michailidou Catalink, Pedro-Tito Macías-Roselló Schneider Electric, Evgeny Prokofyev Schneider Electric, Antoliano Davila Schneider Electric, Tanel Kerstna MindChip, Per Myrseth DNV, Meine Van Der Meulen DNV | ||
09:35 15mFull-paper | An Overview of Cyber Security Funding for Open Source Software EnCyCriS Jukka Ruohonen University of Southern Denmark, Gaurav Choudhary Choudhary Technical University of Denmark, Adam Alami University of Southern Denmark | ||
09:50 15mFull-paper | LLM-Assisted AHP for Explainable Cyber Range Evaluation EnCyCriS Vyron Kampourakis Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Georgios Kavallieratos Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Georgios Spathoulas Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Vasileios Gkioulos NTNU, Sokratis Katsikas Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) | ||
10:05 15mFull-paper | Behind the Quantum Curtain: A practical comparison between SVM and QSVM in OT Anomaly Detection EnCyCriS Alessio Di Santo Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, Nicola Camarda , Walter Tiberti Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, Dajana Cassioli Università degli Studi dell'Aquila | ||
10:20 10mOther | all together : picture EnCyCriS | ||