Accepted Papers
Call for Papers
Technical papers can be short papers (4 pages plus 1 additional page for references) and full papers (10 pages plus 2 additional pages for references).
Research Papers
Short research papers should discuss controversial issues in the field, or describe interesting or thought provoking ideas that are not yet fully developed. Accepted short papers will present their ideas in a short lightning talk. Full research papers are expected to describe new research results, and have a higher degree of technical rigor than short papers.
Practice Experiences
MSR encourages the submission of papers on practice experiences. They should report experiences of applying mining repository algorithms in an industry/open source organization context. They aim at reporting positive or negative experiences of applying known algorithms, but adapting existing algorithms or proposing new algorithms for practical use would be plus.
Reusable Tools
MSR wants to promote and recognize the creation and use of tools that are designed and built not only for a specific research project, but for the MSR community as a whole. Those tools may let researchers focus on specific aspects of research, let their work be more reproducible, lower the barriers to reuse previous research efforts. Therefore, MSR encourages the submission of papers about these tools. These papers can be descriptions of tools built by the authors, that can be used by other researchers, and/or descriptions of use of tools built by others to obtain some specific research results in the area of mining software repositories.
The public availability of the tool and its internal details, its usefulness for other researchers, the measures taken to simplify its installation and use, and the availability of documentation about it should be clearly discussed in the paper. Both long papers, for complete descriptions of mature tools and/or use cases, and short papers, for summaries of promising use cases and tools, will be accepted. The papers will be reviewed both on their academic merits, and on the specific usefulness of the tools, and the experiences described, for the whole MSR community.
Submission and Review of Technical Papers
All technical papers, including those describing practical experiences or tools, will face the same level of review and scrutiny. To take their peculiarities into account, if you consider a paper qualifies as practice or tool paper, specify that using the corresponding option when submitting. Submissions should follow ACM formatting guidelines. Papers submitted for consideration should not have been published elsewhere and should not be under review or submitted for review elsewhere for the duration of consideration. ACM plagiarism policies and procedures shall be followed for cases of double submission.
Papers must be submitted electronically through EasyChair.
Upon notification of acceptance, all authors of accepted papers will be asked to complete an ACM Copyright form and will receive further instructions for preparing their camera ready versions. At least one author of each paper is expected to present the results at the MSR 2018 conference. All accepted contributions will be published in the conference electronic proceedings.
A selection of the best papers will be invited to EMSE Special Issue. All accepted technical papers in 2018 have a chance to win the "MSR FOSS Impact Paper Award“.
Double-blind Submission Guideline
MSR 2018 will conduct double-blind reviewing. All submissions should not reveal the identity of the authors in any way. Authors should leave out author names and affiliations from the body of their submission. They should also ensure that any citations to related work by themselves are written in the third person, that is, “the prior work of XYZ” as opposed to “our prior work”. Authors having further questions on double-blind reviewing are encouraged to contact the Program Co-Chairs by email.
Important Dates
Abstract Due | 23:59 AOE, January 23, 2018 |
Papers Due | 23:59 AOE, January 30, 2018, |
Author Notification | 23:59 AOE, March 2, 2018 |
Camera Ready | 23:59 AOE, March 16, 2018 |
Organization
Program Committee Chairs
- Andy Zaidman, TU Delft, Netherlands
- Emily Hill, Drew University, USA
- Yasutaka Kamei, Kyushu University, Japan
Mon 28 MayDisplayed time zone: Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna change
09:00 - 10:30 | |||
09:00 90mTalk | Mining the Mind, Minding the Mine: Grand Challenges in Comprehension and MiningKeynote Technical Papers |
11:00 - 12:30 | Modularity and DependencyTechnical Papers at E3 room Chair(s): Moritz Beller Delft University of Technology | ||
11:00 17mFull-paper | An Empirical Evaluation of OSGi Dependencies Best Practices in the Eclipse IDE Technical Papers A: Lina Ochoa , A: Thomas Degueule CWI, Netherlands, A: Jurgen Vinju Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica / Technische Universiteit Eindhoven / SWAT.engineering BV | ||
11:17 17mFull-paper | On the impact of security vulnerabilities in the npm package dependency network Technical Papers Link to publication DOI | ||
11:34 17mFull-paper | Feature Location using Crowd-based Screencasts Technical Papers Pre-print | ||
11:51 17mFull-paper | Profiling call changes via motif mining Technical Papers Pre-print | ||
12:08 7mShort-paper | Toward Predicting Architectural Significance of Implementation Issues Technical Papers A: Arman Shahbazian University of Southern California, A: Daye Nam University of Southern California, USA, A: Nenad Medvidović University of Southern California Pre-print | ||
12:15 15mOther | Discussion phase Technical Papers |
14:00 - 15:30 | |||
14:00 17mFull-paper | The Android Update Problem: An Empirical Study Technical Papers DOI Pre-print | ||
14:17 17mFull-paper | Why are Android Apps Removed From Google Play? A Large-scale Empirical Study Technical Papers Pre-print | ||
14:34 17mFull-paper | Anatomy of Functionality Deletion - An Exploratory Study in Mobile Apps Technical Papers A: Maleknaz Nayebi University of Toronto, A: Konstantin Kuznetsov Saarland University, CISPA, A: Paul Chen University of Calgary, A: Andreas Zeller Saarland University, A: Guenther Ruhe University of Calgary Pre-print | ||
14:51 17mFull-paper | Characterising Deprecated Android APIs Technical Papers A: Li Li University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, A: Jun Gao University of Luxembourg, SnT, A: Tegawendé F. Bissyandé University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, A: Lei Ma Harbin Institute of Technology, A: Xin Xia Monash University, A: Jacques Klein University of Luxembourg, SnT Pre-print | ||
15:08 7mShort-paper | Leveraging Historical Versions of Android Apps for Efficient and Precise Taint Analysis Technical Papers Pre-print | ||
15:15 15mOther | Discussion phase Technical Papers |
Tue 29 MayDisplayed time zone: Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna change
09:00 - 10:30 | 2008 Most Influential Paper Award and Evolution and ChangesTechnical Papers at E4 room Chair(s): Cor-Paul Bezemer Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario | ||
09:00 59mTalk | What do large commits tell us? A taxonomical study of large commits Technical Papers Pre-print | ||
09:59 17mFull-paper | SOTorrent: Reconstructing and Analyzing the Evolution Stack Overflow Posts Technical Papers A: Sebastian Baltes University of Trier, A: Lorik Dumani , A: Christoph Treude The University of Adelaide, A: Stephan Diehl Computer Science, University Trier, Germany DOI Pre-print Media Attached | ||
10:16 7mShort-paper | A Design Structure Matrix Approach for Measuring Co-Change-Modularity of Software Products Technical Papers Link to publication DOI Pre-print | ||
10:23 7mShort-paper | A Study on Inappropriately Partitioned Commits --- How Much and What Kinds of IP Commits in Java Projects? --- Technical Papers Pre-print |
14:00 - 15:30 | |||
14:00 17mFull-paper | Analyzing Requirements and Traceability Information to Improve Bug Localization Technical Papers A: Michael Rath Technische Universität Ilmenau, A: David Lo Singapore Management University, A: Patrick Mäder Technische Universität Ilmenau DOI Pre-print | ||
14:17 17mFull-paper | Towards Extracting Web API Specifications from Documentation Technical Papers A: Jinqiu Yang , A: Erik Wittern IBM Research, A: Annie T.T. Ying EquitySim, A: Julian Dolby IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, A: Lin Tan University of Waterloo | ||
14:34 17mFull-paper | Evaluating How Developers Use General-Purpose Web-Search for Code Retrieval Technical Papers A: Md Masudur Rahman University of Virginia, USA, A: Jed Barson University of Virginia, A: Sydney Paul , A: Joshua Kayani , A: Federico Andrés Lois , A: Sebastián Fernandez Quezada , A: Chris Parnin NCSU, A: Kathryn Stolee North Carolina State University, A: Baishakhi Ray Columbia University, New York Pre-print | ||
14:51 17mFull-paper | Learning to Mine Aligned Code and Natural Language Pairs from Stack Overflow Technical Papers A: Pengcheng Yin , A: Bowen Deng Carnegie Mellon University, A: Edgar Chen Carnegie Mellon University, A: Bogdan Vasilescu Carnegie Mellon University, A: Graham Neubig Carnegie Mellon University | ||
15:08 7mShort-paper | A Search System for Mathematical Expressions on Software Binaries Technical Papers A: Ridhi Jain , A: Sai Prathik Saba Bama , A: Venkatesh Vinayakarao IIITD, A: Rahul Purandare IIIT-Delhi DOI Pre-print | ||
15:15 15mOther | Discussion phase Technical Papers |
17:30 - 18:00 | |||
17:30 30mDay closing | Closing Technical Papers |