Specifying and Verifying Concurrent Algorithms with Histories and Subjectivity
We present a lightweight approach to Hoare-style specifications for fine-grained concurrency, based on a notion of time-stamped histories that abstractly capture atomic changes in the program state. Our key observation is that histories form a partial commutative monoid, a structure fundamental for representation of concurrent resources. This insight provides us with a unifying mechanism that allows us to treat histories just like heaps in separation logic. For example, both are subjects to the same assertion logic and inference rules. Moreover, the notion of ownership transfer, which usually applies to heaps, has an equivalent in histories. It can be used to formally represent helping—an important design pattern for concurrent algorithms whereby one thread can execute code on behalf of another. Specifications in terms of histories naturally abstract away the internal interference, so that sophisticated fine-grained algorithms can be given the same specifications as their simplified coarse-grained counterparts, making them equally convenient for client-side reasoning.
Wed 15 AprDisplayed time zone: Azores change
10:30 - 12:30
|The Problem of Programming Language Concurrency Semantics|
|The Best of Both Worlds: Trading Efficiency and Optimality in Fence Insertion for TSO|
|Specifying and Verifying Concurrent Algorithms with Histories and Subjectivity|