The two main approaches to compile generic programs are dynamic dispatch and monomorphization. While the latter is typically preferred in the context of low latency applications, where the overhead of boxing may be prohibitive, it also comes at the cost of important limitations in terms of modularity, expressiveness, and code size.

The Swift programming language proposes an interesting third alternative that addresses these shortcomings, supporting dynamic dispatch without requiring boxing by factoring method tables out of object headers. This paper examines the merits of that strategy, which we call existentialization, across different programming languages. Our study shows that existentialization can produce code with performance comparable to monomorphization.