PROPSER 2021 Contributors

Mon 21 - Wed 23 June 2021

co-located with EASE 2021

Filter

Role Type

Contributing to

Number of Roles

Country

Results (20)

B Antonia BertolinoBertolino, Antonia CNR-ISTIItaly Welcome Introduction Co-chair in Organizing committee within the PROPSER-track
D Guglielmo De AngelisDe Angelis, Guglielmo CNR-IASIItaly About the assessment of grey literature in software engineering
F Robert FeldtFeldt, Robert Chalmers \| University of Gothenburg, Blekinge Institute of TechnologySweden Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track
G Taher A GhalebGhaleb, Taher A Queen's UniversityCanada Towards a more structured peer review process with empirical standards
Carlo GhezziGhezzi, Carlo Politecnico di MilanoItaly Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track
H Wilhelm HasselbringHasselbring, Wilhelm Kiel UniversityGermany Benchmarking as empirical standard in software engineering research
Robert HeinrichHeinrich, Robert A classification for managing software engineering knowledge
K Angelika KaplanKaplan, Angelika Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGermany Towards an automated classification approach for software engineering research A classification for managing software engineering knowledge
Jan KeimKeim, Jan Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Germany Towards an automated classification approach for software engineering research
Barbara KitchenhamKitchenham, Barbara Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track
Anne KoziolekKoziolek, Anne Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGermany Welcome Introduction Co-chair in Organizing committee within the PROPSER-track
L Francesca LonettiLonetti, Francesca CNR-ISTIItaly About the assessment of grey literature in software engineering
M Walter MaximilianMaximilian, Walter A classification for managing software engineering knowledge
P Gustavo PintoPinto, Gustavo UFPABrazil Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track
Lutz PrecheltPrechelt, Lutz Freie Universität BerlinGermany On implicit assumptions underlying software engineering research Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track
R Paul RalphRalph, Paul Dalhousie UniversityCanada Towards a more structured peer review process with empirical standards Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track
Ralf ReussnerReussner, Ralf Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) and FZI - Research Center for Information Technology (FZI)Germany Welcome Introduction Co-chair in Organizing committee within the PROPSER-track
S Klaus SchmidSchmid, Klaus Stiftung University HildesheimGermany If you want better empirical research, value your theory: On the importance of strong theories for progress in empirical software engineering research
T Walter F. TichyTichy, Walter F. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track
V Sira VegasVegas, Sira Universidad Politecnica de MadridSpain Committee Member in Track committees within the PROPSER-track