The International Conference on Compiler Construction (CC) is interested in work on processing programs in the most general sense: analyzing, transforming or executing input that describes how a system operates, including traditional compiler construction as a special case.
CC is an ACM SIGPLAN conference, and implements guidelines and procedures recommended by SIGPLAN.
For more information, please consult the Call for Papers.
Call for Papers
The ACM SIGPLAN 2025 International Conference on Compiler Construction (CC 2025) is interested in work on processing programs in the most general sense: analyzing, transforming or executing input programs that describe how a system operates, including traditional compiler construction as a special case.
Original contributions are solicited on the topics of interest which include, but are not limited to:
-
Compilation and interpretation techniques, including program representation, analysis, and transformation; code generation, optimization, and synthesis; the verification thereof
-
Run-time techniques, including memory management, virtual machines, and dynamic and just-in-time compilation
-
Programming tools, including refactoring editors, checkers, verifiers, compilers, debuggers, and profilers
-
Techniques, ranging from programming languages to micro-architectural support, for specific domains such as secure, parallel, distributed, embedded or mobile environments
-
Design and implementation of novel language constructs, programming models, and domain-specific languages
-
Implications to compiler construction from emerging or non-conventional applications (e.g., deep learning, quantum computing, DNA computing, etc.)
CC is an ACM SIGPLAN conference and implements guidelines and procedures recommended by SIGPLAN. Prospective authors should be aware of ACM’s Copyright policies. Proceedings will be made available online in the ACM digital library from one week before to one week after the conference.
Call for Tool and Practical Experience Papers
This year, CC will offer a second category of papers called “Tools and Practical Experience”. Papers in this category must either give a clear account of a tool’s functionality or summarize a practical experience with realistic case studies. The successful evaluation of an artifact is mandatory for a Tool Paper. Therefore, authors of work conditionally accepted as Tool Papers must submit an artifact to the Artifact Evaluation Committee. The successful evaluation of the artifact is a requirement for final acceptance.
Practical experience papers are encouraged, but not required, to submit an artifact to the Artifact Evaluation process.
The selection criteria for papers in this category are:
-
Originality: Papers should present CC-related technologies applied to real-world problems with scope or characteristics that set them apart from previous solutions.
-
Usability: The presented tools or compilers should have broad usage or applicability. They are expected to assist in CC-related research, or could be extended to investigate or demonstrate new technologies. If significant components are not yet implemented, the paper will not be considered.
-
Documentation: The tool or compiler should be presented on a website giving documentation and further information about the tool.
-
Benchmark Repository: A suite of benchmarks for testing should be provided.
-
Availability: The tool or compiler should be available for public use.
-
Foundations: Papers should incorporate the principles underpinning Compiler Construction (CC). However, a thorough discussion of theoretical foundations is not required; a summary of such should suffice.
-
Artifact Evaluation: The submitted artifact must be functional and support the claims made in the paper. Submission of an artifact is mandatory for papers presenting a tool.
Tool and Practical Experience papers abide by the same limit of 10 pages in the ACM format, references excluded, and are not distinguished in the final proceedings. We encourage shorter submissions that give an account of how scientific ideas have been incorporated and used in practice.
Submission Guidelines
Submission site: https://cc25.hotcrp.com
All submissions must be made electronically through the conference submission website and include an abstract (100–400 words), author contact information, the full list of authors and their affiliations. Full paper submissions must be in PDF formatted printable on US letter size paper.
All papers must be prepared in ACM Conference Format using the 2-column acmart format: use the options \documentclass[sigplan,10pt,review,anonymous]{acmart} for Latex, and interim-layout.docx for Word. Important note: The Word template (interim-layout.docx) on the ACM website uses 9pt font; you need to increase it to 10pt.
Papers should contain a maximum of 10 pages of text (in a typeface no smaller than 10 point) or figures, NOT INCLUDING references. There is no page limit for references and they must include the name of all authors (do not use et al.).
Appendices are not allowed, but the authors may submit anonymous supplementary material, such as proofs, source code, or data sets; all supplementary material must be in PDF or ZIP format. Looking at supplementary material is at the discretion of the reviewers.
Papers may be resubmitted to the submission site multiple times up until the deadline, but the last version submitted before the deadline will be the version reviewed. Papers that exceed the length requirement, that deviate from the expected format, or that are submitted late will be rejected.
CC follows ACM’s Copyright Policies. Prospective authors should adhere to SIGPLAN’s Republication Policy and to ACM’s Policy and Procedures on Plagiarism.
By submitting your article to an ACM Publication, you are hereby acknowledging that you and your co-authors are subject to all ACM Publications Policies, including ACM’s new Publications Policy on Research Involving Human Participants and Subjects. Alleged violations of this policy or any ACM Publications Policy will be investigated by ACM and may result in a full retraction of your paper, in addition to other potential penalties, as per ACM Publications Policy.
Please ensure that you and your co-authors obtain an ORCID ID, so you can complete the publishing process for your accepted paper. ACM has been involved in ORCID from the start and we have recently made a commitment to collect ORCID IDs from all of our published authors. The collection process has started and will roll out as a requirement throughout 2022. We are committed to improve author discoverability, ensure proper attribution and contribute to ongoing community efforts around name normalization; your ORCID ID will help in these efforts.
Double-Blind Reviewing Process
CC uses a double-blind reviewing process. Authors will need to identify any potential conflicts of interest with PC, as defined in the SIGPLAN policy.
To facilitate the double-blind reviewing process, submissions (including supplementary material) should not reveal the identity of the authors in any way. Authors should leave out author names and affiliations from the body of their submission. They should also ensure that any references to authors’ own related work should be in the third person (e.g., not “We build on our previous work …” but rather “We build on the work of …”).
The purpose of this process is to help the PC and external reviewers come to an initial judgment about the paper without bias, not to make it impossible for them to discover the authors if they were to try. Nothing should be done in the name of anonymity that weakens the submission or makes the job of reviewing the paper more difficult. In particular, important background references should not be omitted or anonymized. Artifact Evaluation
Authors are encouraged to submit their artifacts for the Artifact Evaluation (AE). The Artifact Evaluation process begins after the acceptance notification, and is run by a separate committee whose task is to assess how the artifacts support the work described in the papers.
To ease the organization of the AE committee, we kindly ask authors to indicate at the time they submit the paper, whether they are interested in submitting an artifact.
Papers that go through the Artifact Evaluation process successfully will receive a seal of approval printed on the papers themselves.
Authors of accepted papers are encouraged, but not required, to make these materials publicly available upon publication of the proceedings, by including them as “source materials” in the ACM Digital Library.
Additional information will be made available later.
Publication Date
AUTHORS TAKE NOTE: The official publication date is the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM Digital Library. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of your conference. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work.