Mon 7 OctDisplayed time zone: Arizona change
08:45 - 09:00 | SCAM Opening SessionResearch Track at Fremont Chair(s): Coen De Roover Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Valentina Lenarduzzi University of Oulu | ||
09:00 - 10:00 | |||
09:00 60mKeynote | SCAM + VISSOFT Keynote: Code that Generates Visual Art Research Track Benoit Baudry Université de Montréal |
10:30 - 12:00 | Empirical StudiesResearch Track at Fremont Chair(s): Alexander Serebrenik Eindhoven University of Technology | ||
10:30 16mResearch paper | An Empirical Investigation Into the Use of Dockerfile Preprocessors for Docker Image Management Research Track Wataru Mabuchi Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Yutaro Kashiwa Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Kenji Fujiwara Nara Women’s University, Hajimu Iida Nara Institute of Science and Technology | ||
10:47 16mResearch paper | How do Software Engineering Researchers Use GitHub? An Empirical Study of Artifacts & Impact Research Track Pre-print | ||
11:04 16mResearch paper | On the Investigation of Exception Pull Request Characteristics: Exploring the Apache Ecosystem Research Track João Correia PUC-Rio, Daniel Coutinho Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Alessandro Garcia Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rafael de Mello UFRJ, Brazil, Caio Barbosa Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Anderson Oliveira Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Wesley Assunção North Carolina State University, Juliana Alves Pereira PUC-Rio, Igor Steinmacher Northern Arizona University, Marco Gerosa Northern Arizona University, Jairo Souza Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Johny Arriel PUC-Rio Pre-print | ||
11:21 16mResearch paper | Software Quality Assurance Analytics: Enabling Software Engineers to Reflect on QA PracticesVideo Presentation Research Track Ali Khatami Delft University of Technology, Carolin Brandt Delft University of Technology, Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology Pre-print | ||
11:40 20mLive Q&A | Discussion (Empirical Studies) Research Track |
13:30 - 15:00 | |||
13:30 16mResearch paper | Catching Smells in the Act: A GitHub Actions Workflow InvestigationVideo Presentation Research Track Ali Khatami Delft University of Technology, Cédric Willekens Delft University of Technology, Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology Pre-print | ||
13:47 16mResearch paper | Toward Interactive Optimization of Source Code Differences: An Empirical Study of Its Performance Research Track DOI Pre-print | ||
14:04 16mResearch paper | On the Prevalence, Evolution, and Impact of Code Smells in Simulation Modelling Software Research Track Riasat Mahbub Dalhousie University, Masud Rahman Dalhousie University, Muhammad Ahsanul Habib Dalhousie University | ||
14:21 16mResearch paper | An Empirical Analysis of Git Commit Logs for Potential Inconsistency in Code Clones Research Track Pre-print File Attached | ||
14:40 20mLive Q&A | Discussion (Code Smells) Research Track |
15:30 - 17:00 | |||
15:30 16mResearch paper | Enhancing Recommendations of Composite Refactorings based on the Practice Research Track Ana Carla Bibiano Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Anderson Uchôa Federal University of Ceará, Daniel Tenório Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Daniel Coutinho Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Wesley Assunção North Carolina State University, Alessandro Garcia Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Baldoino Fonseca Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Márcio Ribeiro Federal University of Alagoas, Brazil, Thelma Elita Colanzi State University of Maringa, Brazil, Audrey Vasconcelos Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Rafael de Mello UFRJ, Brazil | ||
15:47 16mResearch paper | The Hidden Costs of Automation: An Empirical Study on GitHub Actions Workflow Maintenance Research Track Pablo Valenzuela-Toledo University of Bern, Universidad de La Frontera, Alexandre Bergel University of Chile, Oscar Nierstrasz feenk.com, Timo Kehrer University of Bern Pre-print | ||
16:04 16mResearch paper | Enhancing Identifier Naming Through Multi-Mask Fine-tuning of Language Models of CodeResearch Object ReviewedOpen Research Object Research Track Sanidhya Vijayvargiya BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Mootez Saad Dalhousie University, Tushar Sharma Dalhousie University Pre-print | ||
16:21 16mResearch paper | Enhancing Security through Modularization: A Counterfactual Analysis of Vulnerability Propagation and Detection Precision Research Track Mohammad Mahdi Abdollahpour University of Waterloo, Jens Dietrich Victoria University of Wellington, Patrick Lam University of Waterloo Pre-print | ||
16:40 20mLive Q&A | Discussion (Maintainance) Research Track |
Tue 8 OctDisplayed time zone: Arizona change
08:45 - 10:00 | |||
09:00 60mKeynote | SCAM Keynote: The Quest for Practical Static Analysis Research Track |
13:30 - 15:00 | Testing & DebuggingResearch Track at Fremont Chair(s): Wesley Assunção North Carolina State University | ||
13:30 16mResearch paper | Migrating Unit Tests Across Java Applications Research Track Ajay Jha North Dakota State University, Sarah Nadi New York University Abu Dhabi, University of Alberta Pre-print | ||
13:47 16mResearch paper | PROZE: Generating Parameterized Unit Tests Informed by Runtime Data Research Track Deepika Tiwari KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Yogya Gamage Universtité de Montréal, Martin Monperrus KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Benoit Baudry Université de Montréal Pre-print | ||
14:04 16mResearch paper | The Fault in our Stars: Quality Assessment of Code Generation Benchmarks Research Track Mohammed Latif Siddiq University of Notre Dame, Simantika Bhattacharjee Dristi BRAC University, Joy Saha BRAC University, Joanna C. S. Santos University of Notre Dame Pre-print | ||
14:21 16mResearch paper | Breaking-Good: Explaining Breaking Dependency Updates with Build Analysis Research Track Frank Reyes Garcia KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Benoit Baudry Université de Montréal, Martin Monperrus KTH Royal Institute of Technology Pre-print | ||
14:40 20mLive Q&A | Discussion (Testing & Debugging) Research Track |
15:30 - 16:20 | Engineering / NIERNew Ideas and Emerging Results / Engineering Track at Fremont Chair(s): Eduardo Figueiredo Federal University of Minas Gerais | ||
15:30 10mResearch paper | GitRev: An LLM-based Gamification Framework for Modern Code Review Activities Engineering Track Jasem Khelifi ETS Montreal, University of Quebec, Moataz Chouchen ETS, Ali Ouni ETS Montreal, University of Quebec, Raula Gaikovina Kula Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Dong Wang Kyushu University, Japan, Salma Hamza Mediterranean Institute of Technology, South Mediterranean University, Tunisia, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer University of Michigan - Flint | ||
15:40 10mResearch paper | An Empirical Study on Understanding Performance Issues and Causes in Android Apps New Ideas and Emerging Results Nisha Kumari Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Teerath Das University of Jyväskylä, Tommi Mikkonen University of Jyvaskyla | ||
15:50 10mResearch paper | An Experiment Using Partial Evaluation for Transformational DebuggingOnline presentation New Ideas and Emerging Results Kanae Tsushima Research Organization of Information and Systems (ROIS), Robert Glück University of Copenhagen | ||
16:00 10mResearch paper | Deciphering Discrepancies: A Comparative Analysis of Docker Image Security New Ideas and Emerging Results Brittany Boles Montana State University, Eric O'Donoghue Montana State University, Garrett Perkins Montana State University, Clemente Izurieta Montana State University, Ann Marie Reinhold Montana State University | ||
16:10 10mLive Q&A | Discussion (Engineering / NIER) New Ideas and Emerging Results |
16:20 - 17:00 | SCAM Most Influential PaperResearch Track at Fremont Chair(s): Leon Moonen Simula Research Laboratory and BI Norwegian Business School | ||
16:20 40mTalk | MIP Presentation: "On Automatically Generating Commit Messages via Summarization of Source Code Changes" Research Track Luis Fernando Cortés-Coy , Mario Linares-Vasquez Universidad de los Andes, Jairo Aponte Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Denys Poshyvanyk William & Mary |
17:00 - 17:30 | |||
17:30 - 17:45 | |||
Accepted Papers
Title | |
---|---|
GitRev: An LLM-based Gamification Framework for Modern Code Review Activities Engineering Track |
Call for papers
The Engineering Track in the 24th IEEE International Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM 2024) looks for papers that discuss innovations and solutions to practical problems that researchers and practitioners face in source code analysis and manipulation of software systems. With the research advancements in source code analysis during the past decades, the industry has adopted many of the research ideas and built tools and techniques to solve real-world problems in daily jobs of software engineers. The Engineering Track provides an opportunity to discuss these important and often overlooked ideas and achievements so that software engineers and researchers can use them to improve their engineering development and produce high-quality software. This track aims to bring researchers and software engineers to communicate and share their insights and collaborate on tools, libraries, and infrastructure for source code analysis.
This track welcomes six-page papers (included references) that report on the design and implementation of tools for source code analysis and manipulation, as well as libraries, infrastructure, and real-world studies. The papers are expected to discuss engineering work artifacts that have NOT been published before as the main contribution. We encourage submissions that accompany papers in the Research Track.
What artifacts qualify as Engineering Track material?
- Tools: Software or hardware that facilitate source code analysis.
- Libraries: Reusable APIs and frameworks.
- Infrastructure: Projects that provide/facilitate access to data for reproducibility.
- Data: Reusable datasets for other researchers to reproduce the results.
- Real-world Studies: Studies that focus on how tools, libraries, infrastructure and data enable research.
- Engineering challenges: Identifying engineering challenges that remain unresolved and have impact on research in source-code analysis.
Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
- Program transformation, refactoring, analysis, optimization and measurement.
- Mining repositories, revisions and changes.
- Bad smell detection, clone management, and program comprehension.
- Concern, concept and feature localization and mining.
- Source-level testing, verification, bug detection and prediction, security vulnerability analysis.
- Natural language analysis of source code artifacts.
Submission guidelines
All submissions must be in English and should be submitted electronically in PDF format using EasyChair.
The submission length has a limit of six pages, with the expectation that authors use the space to discuss artifact motivation, design, and use cases in detail. Papers must conform to the IEEE proceedings paper format guidelines. Templates in Latex and Word are available on IEEE’s website. All submissions must be in English and should be submitted electronically in PDF format. Each submission will be reviewed by members of the Engineering Track program committee. Authors of accepted papers will be required to present their contributions at the conference.
The key criterion for acceptance is that the paper should (a) follow the above mentioned guidelines and (b) make an original contribution that can benefit practitioners in the field now and/or others designing and building artifacts for source code analysis and manipulation. The artifacts can range from an early research prototype to a polished deployed product. Papers about commercial products are welcome, as long as the guidelines described above are followed.
Videos and other demo material may be taken into account by reviewers as they review the paper, but the paper should be self contained. In order to preserve the anonymity of the reviewers, such material should be hosted on an anonymous public source, or made available in such a way that the track chairs can download them once and redistribute them to reviewers.
All authors, reviewers, and organizers are expected to uphold the IEEE Code of Conduct. Failure to do so may lead to a (desk) rejection of the paper.
Double-blind Review
This year, we are following a double-blind reviewing process. Submitted papers must adhere to the following rules: - Author names and affiliations must be omitted. (The track co-chairs will check compliance before reviewing begins.) - References to authors’ own related work must be in the third person. (For example, instead of writing “We build on our previous work…” you should write “We build on the work of…”)
If the program chairs find that authors did not respect the rules of double-blind review they can decide to (desk) reject the paper.
Artifact evaluation
ICSME, VISSOFT, and SCAM have joined once more forces and present a single Artifact Evaluation Track for the three venues. We invite authors of any paper accepted to SCAM 2024 to submit artifacts associated with their papers for evaluation. Papers with artifacts that meet the review criteria will be awarded badges, noting their contributions to open science in software engineering.
More information on the Call for Papers of the Joint Artifact Evaluation Track will be available at the ICSME 2024 web page (https://conf.researchr.org/home/icsme-2024).
Proceedings
All accepted papers will appear in the proceedings, which will be available through the IEEE Digital Library.