Evaluating Software Modelling Recommendations: Towards Systematic Guidelines for Modelling
Background: Despite having several advantages, software modelling remains unpopular for developers. Similarly, university students do not see the benefits of software modelling in the university curriculum. Prior research show the lack of guidance for students to do so.
Aims: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of four modelling recommendations to improve student modelling knowledge. Additionally, we aim to discover students’ perceptions of software modelling after taking a course with the recommendations included.
Method: We conducted a mixed method study, including interviews with teaching assistants, student surveys, and a focus group study involving students, teaching assistants, and experts from both modelling and education. Afterwards, we conducted an analysis to draw conclusions.
Results: We find that the four recommendations overall have a positive impact as they help students better understand the modelling knowledge from the course. Students express that specific recommendations help them grasp the concept of software modelling well. We also extend the recommendations by adding more details specific to software modelling and solidifying the recom- mendations into systematic guidelines.
Conclusions: The guidelines can potentially enhance education and training in software modelling, catering to both academic settings and industrial environments. Additionally, the guidelines contribute to improved communication between students and the course itself by outlining what students can expect from modelling assignments and the value inherent in each of these assignments.
Thu 24 OctDisplayed time zone: Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris change
14:00 - 15:30 | Empirical research methods and applicationsESEM Technical Papers / ESEM Emerging Results, Vision and Reflection Papers Track at Telensenyament (B3 Building - 1st Floor) Chair(s): Valentina Lenarduzzi University of Oulu | ||
14:00 20mFull-paper | Game Software Engineering: A Controlled Experiment Comparing Automated Content Generation Techniques ESEM Technical Papers Mar Zamorano López University College London, África Domingo Universidad San Jorge, Carlos Cetina Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain, Federica Sarro University College London | ||
14:20 20mFull-paper | Evaluating Software Modelling Recommendations: Towards Systematic Guidelines for Modelling ESEM Technical Papers | ||
14:40 20mFull-paper | What do we know about Hugging Face? A systematic literature review and quantitative validation of qualitative claims ESEM Technical Papers Jason Jones Purdue University, Wenxin Jiang Purdue University, Nicholas Synovic Loyola University Chicago, George K. Thiruvathukal Loyola University Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory, James C. Davis Purdue University DOI Pre-print | ||
15:00 15mVision and Emerging Results | On the Creation of Representative Samples of Software Repositories ESEM Emerging Results, Vision and Reflection Papers Track June Gorostidi IN3 - UOC, Adem Ait University of Luxembourg, Jordi Cabot Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Javier Luis Cánovas Izquierdo IN3 - UOC Pre-print | ||
15:15 15mVision and Emerging Results | Can ChatGPT emulate humans in software engineering surveys? ESEM Emerging Results, Vision and Reflection Papers Track Igor Steinmacher Northern Arizona University, Jacob Mcauley Penney NAU, Katia Romero Felizardo UTFPR-CP, Alessandro Garcia Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Marco Gerosa Northern Arizona University |