Linking software features to code components is commonly performed during software development and maintenance, including to implement a feature, document code, design test cases, trace requirements, track changes, and support inspection of safety-critical software by government and other third parties. However, manually mapping features to code is error-prone and time consuming, even for developers familiar with a system. To overcome these challenges several studies proposed automated techniques to reduce human intervention when linking features to code components. Nonetheless, three challenges remain: (i) accuracy, (ii) cost, and (iii) explainability. Linking of irrelevant code snippets causes an extra burden of analyses. If the approach lacks explainability, then a tool is less useful for many crucial systems such as safety-critical software. Moreover, heavyweight techniques such as those that require generating execution traces of every scenario or require training deep-learning models are costly and limit small companies from integrating them into their development process. We propose a contextual thematic approach that extracts the most relevant theme properties of the feature/requirement to address the aforementioned challenges. Our experiments with two proprietary projects reveal significant enhancement of performance (precision and F1 scores are more than 50% in ideal cases) in linking features to three abstractions of code components, i.e., modules, classes, and methods. Our approach is also capable of linking commits to issues in a promising way. Contextual theme extraction enhances the subjective explainability which has not yet been solved with existing approaches. Moreover, we extract several critical characteristics of the feature documents and code structures that are important to consider in both manual and automated techniques. Finally, we present the FSECAM tool for linking features to code components, which can be immediately deployed within the development process and used without much effort and cost in linking code components and commits. The replication package of our study is available online with special editor’s note https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26426590.