Explaining Pair Programming Session Dynamics from Knowledge Gaps
Background: Despite a lot of research on the effectiveness of Pair Programming (PP), the question when it is useful or less useful remains unsettled.
Method: We analyze recordings of many industrial PP sessions with Grounded Theory Methodology and build on prior work that identified various phenomena related to within-session knowledge build-up and transfer. We validate our findings with practitioners.
Result: We identify two fundamentally different types of required knowledge and explain how different constellations of knowledge gaps in these two respects lead to different session dynamics. Gaps in project-specific systems knowledge are more hampering than gaps in general programming knowledge and are dealt with first and foremost in a PP session.
Conclusion: Partner constellations with complementary knowledge make PP a particularly effective practice. In PP sessions, differences in system understanding are more important than differences in general software development knowledge.
Wed 27 May
|14:00 - 14:10|
Stress and Burnout in Open Source: Toward Finding, Understanding, and Mitigating Unhealthy InteractionsNIER
Naveen RamanUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Minxuan CaoCarnegie Mellon University, Yulia TsvetkovCarnegie Mellon University, Christian KästnerCarnegie Mellon University, Bogdan VasilescuCarnegie Mellon UniversityPre-print
|14:10 - 14:25|
|14:25 - 14:45|
A Study on the Prevalence of Human Values in Software Engineering Publications, 2015 – 2018Technical
Jon WhittleMonash University, Gillian OliverFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Waqar HussainMonash University, Davoud MougoueiFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Harsha PereraMonash University, Arif NurwidyantoroFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Rifat ShamsMonash University
|14:45 - 15:05|
|15:05 - 15:25|
|15:25 - 15:40|