The Software Engineering Education and Training (SEET) track is premier forum for research and experience reports on challenges, innovations, and best practices in software engineering and training. We invite high quality submissions describing original and unpublished results and experiences.
Tue 7 JulDisplayed time zone: (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time change
16:05 - 17:05 | A6-SEET - Empirical Studies of SE Education and OthersSoftware Engineering Education and Training at Silla Chair(s): Stephan Krusche Technische Universität München | ||
16:05 12mTalk | Presenting and Evaluating the Impact of Experiential Learning in Computing Accessibility EducationSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Yasmine El-Glaly Rochester Institute of Technology, Weishi Shi Rochester Institute of Technology, Samuel Malachowsky Rochester Institute of Technology, Qi Yu Rochester Institute of Technology, Daniel Krutz Rochester Institute of Technology | ||
16:17 12mTalk | An Empirical Study of Teaching Qualities of Popular Computer Science and Software Engineering Instructors Using RateMyProfessor.com DataSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Aliaksei Kavalchuk Pennsylvania State University - Abington, Alec Goldenberg Pennsylvania State University - Abington, Ishtiaque Hussain Pennsylvania State University - Abington | ||
16:29 12mTalk | Sidekicks and Superheroes: A Look into Student Reasoning about Concurrency with Threads versus ActorsSEET Software Engineering Education and Training | ||
16:41 6mExperience report | We should teach our Students what Industry doesn’t wantSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Kevin Ryan Lero The Irish Software Research Centre Ireland | ||
16:47 12mTalk | Understanding DevOps Education with Grounded TheorySEET Software Engineering Education and Training Candy Pang MacEwan University, Abram Hindle University of Alberta, Denilson Barbosa University of Alberta |
Wed 8 JulDisplayed time zone: (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time change
00:00 - 01:00 | P8-SEET - Novel Approaches in SE Education and OthersSoftware Engineering Education and Training at Goguryeo Chair(s): Casper Lassenius Aalto University, Finland and Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering, Norway | ||
00:00 12mTalk | Enriching Programming Student Feedback with Audio CommentsSEET Software Engineering Education and Training | ||
00:12 12mTalk | GidgetML: An Adaptive Serious Game for Enhancing First Year Programming LabsSEET Software Engineering Education and Training | ||
00:24 6mExperience report | Exploiting Group Shuffling Dynamics to Convey the Importance of Good Software DesignSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Jose Benedetto PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE CHILE, Jaime Navon PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE CHILE | ||
00:30 12mTalk | Authentic Individual Assessment for Team-based Software Engineering ProjectsSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Laura Tubino Deakin University, Andrew Cain Deakin University, Jean-Guy Schneider Deakin University, Dhananjay Thiruvady Deakin University, Niroshinie Fernando Deakin University | ||
00:42 12mTalk | Adopting Industry Agile Practices in Large-scale Capstone EducationSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Jean-Guy Schneider Deakin University, Peter Eklund Deakin University, Kevin Lee Deakin University, Feifei Chen Deakin University, Andrew Cain Deakin University, Mohamed Abdelrazek Deakin University |
Thu 9 JulDisplayed time zone: (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time change
07:00 - 08:00 | I14-SEET - Industry Relevant Teaching and OthersSoftware Engineering Education and Training at Goguryeo Chair(s): Letizia Jaccheri Norwegian University of Science and Technology | ||
07:00 12mTalk | Addressing the Double Challenge of Learning and Teaching Enterprise Technologies through Peer TeachingSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Richard Glassey KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Olle Bälter KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Philipp Haller KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Mattias Wiggberg KTH Royal Institute of Technology | ||
07:12 12mTalk | Characterizing the Pedagogical Benefits of Adaptive Feedback for Compilation Errors by Novice ProgrammersSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Umair Z. Ahmed National University of Singapore, Nisheeth Srivastava Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Renuka Sindhgatta Queensland University of Technology, Australia, Amey Karkare IIT Kanpur | ||
07:24 12mTalk | VeriSIM: A Learning Environment for Comprehending Class and Sequence Diagrams using Design TracingSEET Software Engineering Education and Training | ||
07:36 12mTalk | Towards an Open Repository for Teaching Software Modeling applying Active Learning StrategiesSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Williamson Silva UFAM, Bruno Gadelha UFAM, Igor Steinmacher Northern Arizona University, Tayana Conte Universidade Federal do Amazonas | ||
07:48 12mTalk | What prevents Finnish women from applying to software engineering roles? A preliminary analysis of survey dataSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Annika Wolff LUT University, Antti Knutas LUT University, Paula Savolainen Turku University of Applied Sciences Pre-print |
Fri 10 JulDisplayed time zone: (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time change
15:00 - 16:00 | A20-SEET - Novel Approaches in SE EducationSoftware Engineering Education and Training at Goguryeo Chair(s): Seonah Lee Gyeongsang National University | ||
15:00 12mTalk | Using Public and Free Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) based Lightweight Projects for Software Architecture EducationSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Zheng Li University of Concepción | ||
15:12 12mTalk | An Interactive Learning Method to Engage Students in ModelingSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Stephan Krusche Technische Universität München, Nadine von Frankenberg Technical University of Munich, Lara Marie Reimer Technical University of Munich, Bernd Bruegge TU Munich | ||
15:24 12mTalk | Turn up the Heat!: Using Heat Maps to Visualize Suspicious Code to Help Students Successfully Complete Programming Problems FasterSEET Software Engineering Education and Training | ||
15:36 6mExperience report | Teaching Software Engineering for AI-Enabled SystemsSEET Software Engineering Education and Training | ||
15:42 12mTalk | Innovation and Active Learning for Training Mobile App DevelopersSEET Software Engineering Education and Training Fabio Binder Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Regina Albuquerque Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Sheila Reinehr Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Andreia Malucelli Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR) |
Accepted Papers
Call for Papers
Software engineering education is a lifelong activity. Globally, K-12 education has begun to incorporate computing into school, including many foundational concepts from software engineering. Demand for computer and information science graduates is at an all-time high. Coding bootcamps are nearly graduating more software developers than all CS departments combined. And professional software developers’ daily work, more than ever, is defined by learning new languages, new APIs, and new platforms, and discarding old knowledge and skills.
However, many open questions remain about how to support this learning. What skills does software engineering require? How can teachers effectively and equitably teach these skills? How can online materials and communities teach these skills? What is the role of educational technology in supporting this learning and teaching? And how do we integrate this learning into existing and future organizations, such as schools and companies?
The Software Engineering Education and Training track seeks research papers and experience reports on all of these aspects of learning and teaching software engineering. Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
- Foundational research about software engineering skills
- Novel methods of teaching software engineering skills
- Novel methods of evaluating, assessing, and measuring software engineering skills
- Evaluations of teaching and assessment methods
- Empirical studies describing software engineering education contexts
- Novel learning technologies that support software engineering education and training
- Well-substantiated arguments about what skills are most essential to learn
- Investigations into equity, diversity, and inclusion in software engineering education
- Studies of formal learning contexts such as school or trainings
- Studies of informal learning such as hackathons, learning on the job, and Stack Overflow
- The role of culture in software engineering education and training
Submission
- Research papers (5-10 pages, plus up to 2 for references). Papers in this category will be evaluated against the same four criteria as research papers in the ICSE technical track:
- Soundness: How well the paper’s contributions are supported by rigorous application of appropriate research methods.
- Significance: The extent to which the paper’s contributions are novel, original, and important, with respect to the existing literature on software engineering and computing education.
- Verifiability: The extent to which the paper includes sufficient information to support independent verification or replication of the paper’s claimed contributions,
- Presentation: The extent to which the paper’s quality of writing includes clear descriptions and explanations, absence of major ambiguity, clearly readable figures and tables, and adherence to the formatting.
- Experience reports (up to 4 pages). Papers in this category will be held to the same presentation, verifiability, and significance criteria as research papers, but not to the soundness criterion. Typical experience reports will describe an idea or an experience, but not evaluate it, nor use research methods to support claims about it.
All SEET submissions must not exceed 10 pages, including all text, figures, tables, and appendices. Two additional pages containing only references are permitted for research papers. Additionally:
- Formatting instructions are available at https://www.acm.org/publications/proceedings-template for both LaTeX and Word users. LaTeX users must use the provided acmart.cls and ACM-Reference-Format.bst without modification, enable the conference format in the preamble of the document (i.e.,
\documentclass[sigconf,review]{acmart}
), and use the ACM reference format for the bibliography (i.e.,\bibliographystyle{ACM-Reference-Format}
). The review option adds line numbers, thereby allowing referees to refer to specific lines in their comments. - Submission must comply with the ACM plagiarism policy and procedures. In particular, it must not have been published elsewhere and must not be under review elsewhere while under review for ICSE.
- Submissions must comply with the IEEE Policy on Authorship.
All papers will be reviewed using a double-blind review process. This means that submissions should make every effort to avoid disclosing the authors’ identity or affiliation, including anonymizing the names and affiliations in the submitted draft. A submission found to violate the double-blind review guidelines might be desk-rejected before review. For more details, please see the author tips in the ICSE 2020 double blind review process description.
Each submission will be reviewed by at least three members of the program committee. All papers 4 or fewer pages will be treated as experience reports. All other papers will be reviewed as research papers.
Accepted papers and panel summaries will be published in the ICSE-SEET 2020 Proceedings and in the ACM and IEEE digital libraries. The official publication date of the proceedings is the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM Digital Library. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of the conference. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work.
Conference Attendance Expectation
If a submission is accepted, at least one author of the paper is required to register for and attend the full 3-day technical conference and present the paper in person.
Important Dates
Submissions deadline: 29 October, 2019
Notification of reviewing decisions: 15 January, 2020
Camera ready due: 7 February, 2020