This paper investigates how developers conceptualize AI-powered Development Tools and how these role attributions influence technology acceptance. Through qualitative analysis of 38 interviews and a quantitative survey with 102 participants, we identify two primary Mental Models: AI as an \textbf{inanimate tool} and AI as a \textbf{human-like teammate}. Factor analysis further groups AI roles into \textbf{Support Roles} (e.g., assistant, reference guide) and \textbf{Expert Roles} (e.g., advisor, problem solver). We find that assigning multiple roles to AI correlates positively with Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use, indicating that diverse conceptualizations enhance AI adoption. These insights suggest that AI4SE tools should accommodate varying user expectations through adaptive design strategies that align with different Mental Models.
Comet is one of the meeting rooms close to Andromeda.
From the registration desk, go towards the restaurant, turn left towards the bar. Comet is the third room on the left side (the second last before Andromeda).
Comet is one of the meeting rooms close to Andromeda.
From the registration desk, go towards the restaurant, turn left towards the bar. Comet is the third room on the left side (the second last before Andromeda).
