Configuration dependencies arise when multiple technologies in a software system require coordinated settings for correct interplay. Existing approaches for detecting such dependencies often yield high false-positive rates, require additional validation mechanisms, and are typically limited to specific projects or technologies. Recent work that incorporates large language models (LLMs) for dependency validation still suffers from inaccuracies due to project- and technology-specific variations, as well as from missing contextual information.

In this work, we propose to use retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems for configuration dependency validation, which allows us to incorporate additional project- and technology-specific context information. Specifically, we evaluate whether RAG can improve LLM-based validation of configuration dependencies and what contextual information are needed to overcome the static knowledge base of LLMs. To this end, we conducted a large empirical study on validating configuration dependencies using RAG. Our evaluation shows that vanilla LLMs already demonstrate solid validation abilities, while RAG has only marginal or even negative effects on the validation performance of the models. By incorporating tailored contextual information into the RAG system–derived from a qualitative analysis of validation failures–we achieve significantly more accurate validation results across all models, with an average precision of 0.84 and recall of 0.70, representing improvements of 35% and 133% over vanilla LLMs, respectively. In addition, these results offer two important insights: Simplistic RAG systems may not benefit from additional information if it is not tailored to the task at hand, and it is often unclear upfront what kind of information yields improved performance.