Using Focus to Personalise Learning and Feedback in Software Engineering Education
The Task-Oriented Portfolio Assessment (TOPA) model, and associated software support tools, have been demonstrated to be effective in engaging and supporting student success in software engineering education. TOPA utilises frequent formative feedback, delayed summative grading, and standards-aligned outcomes-based assessment. This model engages students and staff in dialogue throughout the teaching period through a cyclic feedback process designed to enhance student learning. Recently proposed changes of introducing “\textit{Focus}” in the model aims to enhance the formative feedback processes and student learning outcomes by introducing a new mechanism to help direct student attention and guide tutor feedback. In this paper, we progress this initiative through several staff focus groups. The focus groups discussed the proposed changes, with staff invited to help co-create enhancements to the model. Results indicate that staff believe the changes will benefit their teaching and highlighted several opportunities for this initiative to encourage students to have a more holistic view of their studies. The main challenges reported included staff workload and complexity for students, which will need to be addressed through careful attention to the user experience in the design of the proposed changes.
Fri 19 MayDisplayed time zone: Hobart change
15:45 - 17:15 | SE education methods and toolsTechnical Track / SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training at Meeting Room 101 Chair(s): Andrew Begel Carnegie Mellon University | ||
15:45 15mTalk | On the Applicability of Language Models to Block-Based Programs Technical Track Elisabeth Griebl University of Passau, Benedikt Fein University of Passau, Florian Obermueller University of Passau, Gordon Fraser University of Passau, René Just University of Washington | ||
16:00 15mTalk | Improving Grading Outcomes in Software Engineering Projects Through Automated Contributions Summaries SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training Kai Presler-Marshall Bowdoin College, Sarah Heckman North Carolina State University, Kathryn Stolee North Carolina State University | ||
16:15 15mTalk | Analyzing the Quality of Submissions in Online Programming Courses SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training Maria Tigina JetBrains Research, Anastasiia Birillo JetBrains Research, Yaroslav Golubev JetBrains Research, Hieke Keuning Utrecht University, Nikolay Vyahhi Stepik, Timofey Bryksin JetBrains Research Pre-print | ||
16:30 15mTalk | A Metric for Measuring Software Engineering Post-Graduate Outcomes SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training | ||
16:45 7mTalk | Using Focus to Personalise Learning and Feedback in Software Engineering Education SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training Bansri Amish Modi School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Andrew Cain School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Guy Wood-Bradley Deakin University, Jake Renzella University of New South Wales, Sydney | ||
16:52 7mTalk | Shaping a Tool for Developing Computing Students’ Professional Identity - Industry Perspectives SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training Laura Tubino Deakin University, Kerri Morgan Deakin University, Guy Wood-Bradley Deakin University, Andrew Cain School of Information Technology, Deakin University | ||
17:00 7mTalk | REFERENT: Transformer based Feedback Generation using Assignment Information for Programming Course SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training Jinseok Heo Sungkyunkwan University, Hohyeon Jeong Sungkyunkwan University, Dongwook Choi SungKyunKwan University, Eunseok Lee Sungkyunkwan University | ||
17:07 7mTalk | Factors Affecting Compilable State at Each Keystroke in CS1 SEET - Software Engineering Education and Training Steven Scott Utah State University, Arto Hellas Aalto University, Juho Leinonen The University of Auckland, John Edwards Utah State University |