In this paper, we use the lens of co-creation—a concept originally coined and applied in the fields of management and design that denotes how groups of people collaboratively create something of meaning through an orchestration of people, activities, and tools—to study how fully remote software teams co-create digital artifacts that can be considered as a form of documentation. We report on the results of a qualitative, interview-based study with 25 software professionals working in remote teams. Our primary findings are the definition of four models of co-creation, examples of sequencing these models into work chains to produce artifacts, factors that influence how developers match tasks to models and chains, and insights into tool support for co-creation. Together, our findings illustrate how co-creation is an intentional activity that has a significant role in how remote software teams’ choose to structure their collaborative activities.
Wed 17 AprDisplayed time zone: Lisbon change
16:00 - 17:30 | Human and Social Aspects, and Requirements 1Research Track / Software Engineering in Society / Journal-first Papers at Fernando Pessoa Chair(s): Birgit Penzenstadler Chalmers | ||
16:00 15mTalk | Co-Creation in Fully Remote Software Teams Research Track Victoria Jackson University of California, Irvine, Rafael Prikladnicki School of Technology at PUCRS University, Andre van der Hoek University of California, Irvine | ||
16:15 15mTalk | A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges Research Track Jenny T. Liang Carnegie Mellon University, Chenyang Yang Carnegie Mellon University, Brad A. Myers Carnegie Mellon University | ||
16:30 15mTalk | How to Support ML End-User Programmers through a Conversational Agent Research Track Emily Judith Arteaga Garcia Oregon State University, João Felipe Pimentel Northern Arizona University, Zixuan Feng Oregon State University, Marco Gerosa Northern Arizona University, Igor Steinmacher Northern Arizona University, Anita Sarma Oregon State University DOI Authorizer link | ||
16:45 15mTalk | Unveiling the Life Cycle of User Feedback: Best Practices from Software Practitioners Research Track Ze Shi Li University of Victoria, Nowshin Nawar Arony University of Victoria, Kezia Devathasan University of Victoria, Manish Sihag University of Victoria, Neil Ernst University of Victoria, Daniela Damian University of Victoria | ||
17:00 15mTalk | Challenges, Strengths, and Strategies of Software Engineers with ADHD: A Case Study Software Engineering in Society Grischa Liebel Reykjavik University, Noah Langlois ISAE-ENSMA, Kiev Gama Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) Pre-print | ||
17:15 7mTalk | Safety of Perception Systems for Automated Driving: A Case Study on Apollo Journal-first Papers Sangeeth Kochanthara Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) , Tajinder Singh Siemens Digital Industries Software, Alexandru Forrai Siemens Digital Industries Software, Loek Cleophas Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) and Stellenbosch University (SU) | ||
17:22 7mTalk | Exposing Algorithmic Discrimination and Its Consequences in Modern Society: Insights from a Scoping Study Software Engineering in Society Ramandeep Singh Dehal Cape Breton University, Mehak Sharma Cape Breton University, Ronnie de Souza Santos University of Calgary Pre-print |