The research community has developed numerous tools for solving verification problems, but we are missing a common interface for executing them. This means users have to spend considerable effort on the installation and parameter setup, for each new tool (version) they want to execute. The situation could make a verification researcher wanting to experiment with a new verification tool turn away from it. The burden of making a verification tool accessible falls completely on the tool developers.
We aim to make it easier for users to execute verification tools, as well as provide mechanism for tool developers to make their tools easily accessible. Our solution combines a web service and a common interface for verification tools. The presented service has been used during the 2023 competitions on software verification and testing, for integration testing. As another use-case, we developed a service for incremental verification on top of the CoVeriTeam Service and demonstrate its use in a continuous-integration script.
Wed 17 MayDisplayed time zone: Hobart change
11:00 - 12:30 | Formal verificationSEIP - Software Engineering in Practice / DEMO - Demonstrations / Technical Track / NIER - New Ideas and Emerging Results / Showcase at Meeting Room 104 Chair(s): Bonita Sharif University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA | ||
11:00 15mTalk | How Do We Read Formal Claims? Eye-Tracking and the Cognition of Proofs about Algorithms Technical Track Hammad Ahmad University of Michigan, Zachary Karas University of Michigan, Kimberly Diaz University of Michigan, Amir Kamil University of Michigan, Jean-Baptiste Jeannin University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Westley Weimer University of Michigan | ||
11:15 15mTalk | Which of My Assumptions are Unnecessary for Realizability and Why Should I Care? Technical Track Pre-print | ||
11:30 15mTalk | Understanding Inconsistency in Azure Cosmos DB with TLA+ SEIP - Software Engineering in Practice Alistair Finn Hackett University of British Columbia, Joshua Rowe Microsoft, Markus Alexander Kuppe Microsoft Research | ||
11:45 15mTalk | Rely/Guarantee Reasoning for Multicopy Atomic Weak Memory Models Showcase Nicholas Coughlin Defence Science and Technology Group, Australia, Kirsten Winter Defence Science and Technology Group, Australia, Graeme Smith The University of Queensland | ||
12:00 7mTalk | HOME: Heard-Of based Formal Modeling and Verification Environment for Consensus Protocols DEMO - Demonstrations Shumao Zhai Beihang University, Xiaozhou Li University of Oulu, Ning Ge School of Software, Beihang University | ||
12:07 7mTalk | CoVeriTeam Service: Verification as a Service DEMO - Demonstrations | ||
12:15 7mTalk | Proofster: Automated Formal Verification DEMO - Demonstrations Arpan Agrawal University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Emily First University of Massachusetts Amherst, Zhanna Kaufman University of Massachusetts, Tom Reichel University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Shizhuo Zhang University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Timothy Zhou University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Alex Sanchez-Stern University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Talia Ringer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Yuriy Brun University of Massachusetts Media Attached | ||
12:22 7mTalk | Anti-Patterns (Smells) in Temporal Specifications NIER - New Ideas and Emerging Results Dor Ma'ayan Tel Aviv University, Shahar Maoz Tel Aviv University, Jan Oliver Ringert Bauhaus-University Weimar Pre-print | ||