Tool Demo TrackICSME 2023
Wed 4 OctDisplayed time zone: Bogota, Lima, Quito, Rio Branco change
10:30 - 12:00 | Machine Learning ApplicationsResearch Track / Industry Track / New Ideas and Emerging Results Track at Session 1 Room - RGD 004 Chair(s): Masud Rahman Dalhousie University | ||
10:30 16mTalk | GPTCloneBench: A comprehensive benchmark of semantic clones and cross-language clones using GPT-3 model and SemanticCloneBench Research Track Ajmain Inqiad Alam University of Saskatchewan, Palash Ranjan Roy University of Saskatchewan, Farouq Al-omari University of Saskatchewan, Chanchal K. Roy University of Saskatchewan, Banani Roy University of Saskatchewan, Kevin Schneider University of Saskatchewan Pre-print | ||
10:46 16mTalk | DeltaNN: Assessing the Impact of Computational Environment Parameters on the Performance of Image Recognition Models Industry Track Nikolaos Louloudakis University of Edinburgh, Perry Gibson University of Glasgow, José Cano University of Glasgow, Ajitha Rajan University of Edinburgh | ||
11:02 16mTalk | You Augment Me: Exploring ChatGPT-based Data Augmentation for Semantic Code Search Research Track Yanlin Wang Sun Yat-sen University, Lianghong Guo Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Ensheng Shi Xi’an Jiaotong University, Wenqing Chen Sun Yat-sen University, Jiachi Chen Sun Yat-sen University, Wanjun Zhong Sun Yat-sen University, Menghan Wang eBay Inc., Hui Li Xiamen University, Ziyu Lyu Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hongyu Zhang Chongqing University, Zibin Zheng Sun Yat-sen University | ||
11:18 11mTalk | Benchmarking Causal Study to Interpret Large Language Models for Source Code New Ideas and Emerging Results Track Daniel Rodriguez-Cardenas , David Nader Palacio William and Mary, Dipin Khati William & Mary, Henry Burke William & Mary, Denys Poshyvanyk William & Mary | ||
11:29 16mTalk | Deploying Deep Reinforcement Learning Systems: A Taxonomy of Challenges Research Track Ahmed Haj Yahmed École Polytechnique de Montréal, Altaf Allah Abbassi Polytechnique Montreal, Amin Nikanjam École Polytechnique de Montréal, Heng Li Polytechnique Montréal, Foutse Khomh Polytechnique Montréal | ||
11:45 15mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
10:30 - 12:00 | Software QualityJournal First Track / Tool Demo Track / New Ideas and Emerging Results Track / Research Track at Session 2 Room - RGD 04 Chair(s): Valentina Lenarduzzi University of Oulu, César França Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco | ||
10:30 16mTalk | Featherweight Assisted Vulnerability Discovery Journal First Track David Binkley Loyola University Maryland, Leon Moonen Simula Research Laboratory and BI Norwegian Business School, Sibren Isaacman Loyola University Maryland | ||
10:46 11mTalk | DebtViz: A Tool for Identifying, Measuring, Visualizing, and Monitoring Self-Admitted Technical Debt Tool Demo Track Yikun Li University of Groningen, Mohamed Soliman , Paris Avgeriou University of Groningen, The Netherlands, Maarten van Ittersum | ||
10:57 11mTalk | Mining and Fusing Productivity Metrics with Code Quality Information at Scale Tool Demo Track Harsh Mukeshkumar Shah Dalhousie University, Qurram Zaheer Syed , Bharatwaaj Shankaranarayanan , Indranil Palit Dalhousie University, Arshdeep Singh , Kavya Raval , Kishan Savaliya , Tushar Sharma Dalhousie University Pre-print | ||
11:08 16mTalk | An Investigation of Confusing Code Patterns in JavaScript Journal First Track Adriano Torres Computer Science Department, University of Brasília, Caio Oliveira Computer Science Department, University of Brasília, Marcio Okimoto Computer Science Department, University of Brasília, Diego Marcilio USI Università della Svizzera italiana, Pedro Queiroga Informatics Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Fernando Castor Utrecht University & Federal University of Pernambuco, Rodrigo Bonifácio Computer Science Department - University of Brasília, Edna Dias Canedo University of Brasilia (UnB), Márcio Ribeiro Federal University of Alagoas, Brazil, Eduardo Monteiro Statistics Department, University of Brasília | ||
11:24 11mTalk | StaticTracker: A Diff Tool for Static Code Warnings Tool Demo Track | ||
11:35 11mTalk | Capturing Contextual Relationships of Buggy Classes for Detecting Quality-Related Bugs New Ideas and Emerging Results Track | ||
11:46 14mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
13:30 - 15:00 | Mining Software RepositoriesResearch Track / New Ideas and Emerging Results Track / Industry Track at Session 1 Room - RGD 004 Chair(s): Denys Poshyvanyk William & Mary, Esteban Parra Belmont University | ||
13:30 16mTalk | The Future Can’t Help Fix The Past: Assessing Program Repair In The Wild Research Track Vinay Kabadi The University of Melbourne, Dezhen Kong Zhejiang University, Siyu Xie Zhejiang University, Lingfeng Bao , Gede Artha Azriadi Prana Singapore Management University, Tien-Duy B. Le Singapore Management University, Xuan-Bach D. Le University of Melbourne, David Lo Singapore Management University | ||
13:46 16mTalk | Process Mining from Jira Issues at a Large Company Industry Track Bavo Coremans Thermo Fisher Scientific, Arjen Klomp Thermo Fisher Scientific, Satrio Adi Rukmono , Jacob Krüger Eindhoven University of Technology, Dirk Fahland Eindhoven University of Technology, Michel Chaudron Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands | ||
14:02 16mTalk | Software Bill of Materials Adoption: A Mining Study from GitHub Research Track Sabato Nocera University of Salerno, Simone Romano University of Salerno, Massimiliano Di Penta University of Sannio, Italy, Rita Francese University of Salerno, Giuseppe Scanniello University of Salerno | ||
14:18 11mTalk | An Empirical Study on the Use of Snapshot Testing New Ideas and Emerging Results Track Shun Fujita Kyoto University, Yutaro Kashiwa Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Bin Lin Radboud University, Hajimu Iida Nara Institute of Science and Technology | ||
14:29 16mTalk | A Framework for Automating the Measurement of DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) Metrics Research Track Brennan Wilkes University of Victoria, Alessandra Maciel Paz Milani University of Victoria, Margaret-Anne Storey University of Victoria | ||
14:45 15mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
15:30 - 16:45 | ROSEArtifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival at Session 1 Room - RGD 004 Chair(s): Venera Arnaoudova Washington State University, Sonia Haiduc Florida State University | ||
15:30 5mTalk | ROSE Festival Introduction Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival | ||
15:35 5mTalk | PyAnaDroid: A fully-customizable execution pipeline for benchmarking Android Applications Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival | ||
15:40 5mTalk | Artifact for What’s in a Name? Linear Temporal Logic Literally Represents Time Lines Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival Runming Li Carnegie Mellon University, Keerthana Gurushankar Carnegie Mellon University, Marijn Heule Carnegie Mellon University, Kristin Yvonne Rozier Iowa State University | ||
15:45 5mTalk | PASD: A Performance Analysis Approach Through the Statistical Debugging of Kernel Events Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival | ||
15:50 5mTalk | Interactively exploring API changes and versioning consistency Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival souhaila serbout Software Institute @ USI, Diana Carolina Munoz Hurtado University of Lugano, Switzerland, Cesare Pautasso Software Institute, Faculty of Informatics, USI Lugano | ||
15:55 5mTalk | Generating Understandable Unit Tests through End-to-End Test Scenario Carving Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival | ||
16:00 5mTalk | Understanding the NPM Dependencies Ecosystem of a Project Using Virtual Reality - Artifact Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival David Moreno-Lumbreras Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Michele Lanza Software Institute - USI, Lugano | ||
16:05 5mTalk | DGT-AR: Visualizing Code Dependencies in AR Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival Dussan Freire-Pozo , Kevin Cespedes-Arancibia , Leonel Merino University of Stuttgart, Alison Fernandez Blanco Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Andres Neyem , Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile | ||
16:10 5mTalk | Calibrating Deep Learning-based Code Smell Detection using Human Feedback Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival Himesh Nandani Dalhousie University, Mootez Saad Dalhousie University, Tushar Sharma Dalhousie University | ||
16:15 5mTalk | A Component-Sensitive Static Analysis Based Approach for Modeling Intents in Android Apps Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival Negarsadat Abolhassani University of Southern California, William G.J. Halfond University of Southern California | ||
16:20 5mTalk | Uncovering the Hidden Risks: The Importance of Predicting Bugginess in Untouched Methods Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival Matteo Esposito University of Rome Tor Vergata, Davide Falessi University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy | ||
16:25 5mTalk | GPTCloneBench: A comprehensive benchmark of semantic clones and cross-language clones using GPT-3 model and SemanticCloneBench Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival Ajmain Inqiad Alam University of Saskatchewan, Palash Ranjan Roy University of Saskatchewan, Farouq Al-omari University of Saskatchewan, Chanchal K. Roy University of Saskatchewan, Banani Roy University of Saskatchewan, Kevin Schneider University of Saskatchewan | ||
16:30 5mTalk | RefSearch: A Search Engine for Refactoring Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival DOI Pre-print Media Attached | ||
16:35 5mTalk | Can We Trust the Default Vulnerabilities Severity? Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival Matteo Esposito University of Rome Tor Vergata, Sergio Moreschini Tampere University, Valentina Lenarduzzi University of Oulu, David Hastbacka , Davide Falessi University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy | ||
16:40 5mTalk | ROSE Awards Artifact Evaluation Track and ROSE Festival |
15:30 - 17:00 | Technical Briefing on srcML & srcDiff: Infrastructure to Support Exploring, Analyzing, and Differencing of Source CodeResearch Track at Session 4 Room - RGD 005 Chair(s): Michael J. Decker Bowling Green State University, Jonathan I. Maletic Kent State University This technology briefing is intended for those interested in constructing custom software analysis and manipulation tools to support research. The briefing is also aimed at researchers interested in leveraging syntactic differencing in their investigations. srcML (srcML.org) is an infrastructure consisting of an XML representation for C/C++/C#/Java source code along with efficient parsing technology to convert source code to-and-from the srcML format. srcDiff (srcDiff.org) is an infrastructure supporting syntactic source-code differencing and change analysis. srcDiff leverages srcML along with an efficient differencing algorithm to produce deltas that accurately model developer edits. In this tech briefing, we give an overview of srcML and srcDiff along with a tutorial of how to use them to support research efforts. The briefing is also a forum to seek feedback and input from the community on what new enhancements and features will better support software engineering research. | ||
Thu 5 OctDisplayed time zone: Bogota, Lima, Quito, Rio Branco change
10:30 - 12:00 | Software Testing - 1Research Track / Industry Track at Session 1 Room - RGD 004 Chair(s): Amjed Tahir Massey University | ||
10:30 16mTalk | GMBFL: Optimizing Mutation-Based Fault Localization via Graph Representation Research Track Shumei Wu Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Zheng Li Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Yong Liu Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Xiang Chen Nantong University, Mingyu Li Beijing University of Chemical Technology | ||
10:46 16mTalk | Characterizing the Complexity and Its Impact on Testing in ML-Enabled Systems - A Case Study on Rasa Research Track Junming Cao Fudan University, Bihuan Chen Fudan University, Longjie Hu Fudan University, Jie Gao Singapore University of Technology and Design, Kaifeng Huang Fudan University, Xuezhi Song Fudan University, Xin Peng Fudan University | ||
11:02 16mTalk | Software Testing and Code Refactoring: A Survey with Practitioners Industry Track Danilo Lima , Ronnie de Souza Santos University of Calgary, Guilherme Pires , Sildemir Silva , César França Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE), Luiz Fernando Capretz Western University | ||
11:18 16mTalk | A manual categorization of new quality issues on automatically-generated tests Research Track Geraldine Galindo-Gutierrez Exact Sciences and Engineering Research Center (CICEI) - Bolivian Catholic University, Maximiliano Narea Carvajal Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Alison Fernandez Blanco Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Nicolas Anquetil University of Lille, Lille, France, Juan Pablo Sandoval Alcocer Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile | ||
11:34 16mTalk | Revisiting Machine Learning based Test Case Prioritization for Continuous Integration Research Track | ||
11:50 10mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
10:30 - 12:00 | Software ChangesResearch Track / Journal First Track / Industry Track / Tool Demo Track at Session 2 Room - RGD 04 Chair(s): Tushar Sharma Dalhousie University, Shurui Zhou University of Toronto | ||
10:30 16mTalk | CCBERT: Self-Supervised Code Change Representation Learning Research Track Xin Zhou Singapore Management University, Singapore, Bowen Xu North Carolina State University, DongGyun Han Royal Holloway, University of London, Zhou Yang Singapore Management University, Junda He Singapore Management University, David Lo Singapore Management University Pre-print | ||
10:46 16mTalk | Identifying Defect-Inducing Changes in Visual Code Industry Track Pre-print | ||
11:02 16mTalk | On the Relation of Method Popularity to Breaking Changes in the Maven Ecosystem Journal First Track Mehdi Keshani Delft University of Technology, Simcha Vos Delft University of Technology, Sebastian Proksch Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Link to publication | ||
11:18 11mTalk | Wait, wasn't that code here before? Detecting Outdated Software Documentation Tool Demo Track Wen Siang Tan The University of Adelaide, Markus Wagner Monash University, Australia, Christoph Treude University of Melbourne | ||
11:29 16mTalk | Recommending Code Reviews Leveraging Code Changes with Structured Information Retrieval Research Track Ohiduzzaman Shuvo Dalhousie University, Parvez Mahbub Dalhousie University, Masud Rahman Dalhousie University | ||
11:45 15mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
13:30 - 15:00 | Security and Program RepairResearch Track / Industry Track at Session 1 Room - RGD 004 Chair(s): Quentin Stiévenart Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Ashkan Sami Edinburgh Napier University | ||
13:30 16mTalk | Enhancing Code Language Models for Program Repair by Curricular Fine-tuning Framework Research Track Sichong Hao Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Xianjun Shi Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Hongwei Liu Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Yanjun Shu Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology | ||
13:46 16mTalk | ScaleFix: An Automated Repair of UI Scaling Accessibility Issues in Android Applications Research Track Ali S. Alotaibi University of Southern California, Paul T. Chiou University of Southern California, Fazle Mohammed Tawsif University of Southern California, William G.J. Halfond University of Southern California | ||
14:02 16mTalk | Finding an Optimal Set of Static Analyzers To Detect Software Vulnerabilities Industry Track Jiaqi He University of Alberta, Revan MacQueen University of Alberta, Natalie Bombardieri University of Alberta, Karim Ali University of Alberta, James Wright University of Alberta, Cristina Cifuentes Oracle Labs | ||
14:18 16mTalk | DockerCleaner: Automatic Repair of Security Smells in Dockerfiles Research Track Quang-Cuong Bui Hamburg University of Technology, Malte Laukötter Hamburg University of Technology, Riccardo Scandariato Hamburg University of Technology Pre-print | ||
14:34 16mTalk | Exploring Security Commits in Python Research Track Shiyu Sun George Mason University, Shu Wang George Mason University, Xinda Wang George Mason University, Yunlong Xing George Mason University, Elisa Zhang Dougherty Valley High School, Kun Sun George Mason University Pre-print | ||
14:50 10mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
15:30 - 17:00 | Software FaultsIndustry Track / Research Track / Journal First Track at Session 1 Room - RGD 004 Chair(s): Masud Rahman Dalhousie University, Ashkan Sami Edinburgh Napier University | ||
15:30 16mTalk | An Empirical Study on Fault Diagnosisa in Robotic Systems Research Track Xuezhi Song Fudan University, Yi Li , Zhen Dong Fudan University, China, Shuning Liu Fudan University, Junming Cao Fudan University, Xin Peng Fudan University | ||
15:46 16mTalk | Predicting Defective Visual Code Changes in a Multi-Language AAA Video Game Project Industry Track Pre-print | ||
16:02 16mTalk | An annotation-based approach for finding bugs in neural network programs Journal First Track Mohammad Rezaalipour Software Institute @ USI, Carlo A. Furia Università della Svizzera italiana (USI) | ||
16:18 11mTalk | Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Bug Localization: Two Industrial Cases Industry Track Shinpei Hayashi Tokyo Institute of Technology, Takashi Kobayashi Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tadahisa Kato Hitachi, Ltd. DOI Pre-print | ||
16:29 16mTalk | An Empirical Study on Bugs Inside PyTorch: A Replication Study Research Track Sharon Chee Yin Ho Concordia University, Vahid Majdinasab Polytechnique Montréal, Mohayeminul Islam University of Alberta, Diego Costa Concordia University, Canada, Emad Shihab Concordia Univeristy, Foutse Khomh Polytechnique Montréal, Sarah Nadi University of Alberta, Muhammad Raza Queen's University | ||
16:45 15mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
15:30 - 17:00 | Program AnalysisResearch Track / Journal First Track / Industry Track at Session 2 Room - RGD 04 Chair(s): Fabio Petrillo École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS), Montréal -- Université du Québec, Mark Hills Appalachian State University | ||
15:30 16mTalk | Slicing Shared-Memory Concurrent Programs, The Threaded System Dependence Graph Revisited Research Track Carlos Galindo Universitat Politècnica de València, Marisa Llorens Universitat Politècnica de València, Sergio Perez Rubio Universitat Politècnica de València, Josep Silva Universitat Politècnica de València | ||
15:46 16mTalk | An Expressive and Modular Layer Activation Mechanism for Context-Oriented Programming Journal First Track Paul Leger Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile, Nicolás Cardozo Universidad de los Andes, Hidehiko Masuhara Tokyo Institute of Technology Link to publication DOI | ||
16:02 16mTalk | Dynamic Slicing of WebAssembly Binaries Research Track Quentin Stiévenart Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), David Binkley Loyola University Maryland, Coen De Roover Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pre-print | ||
16:18 11mTalk | OLA: Property Directed Outer Loop Abstraction for Efficient Verification of Reactive Systems Industry Track | ||
16:29 16mTalk | A Component-Sensitive Static Analysis Based Approach for Modeling Intents in Android Apps Research Track Negarsadat Abolhassani University of Southern California, William G.J. Halfond University of Southern California | ||
16:45 15mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
Fri 6 OctDisplayed time zone: Bogota, Lima, Quito, Rio Branco change
10:30 - 12:00 | Software Testing - 2Tool Demo Track / Industry Track / Research Track / New Ideas and Emerging Results Track at Session 1 Room - RGD 004 Chair(s): Nicolas Archila , Amjed Tahir Massey University | ||
10:30 16mTalk | A Guided Mutation Strategy for Smart Contract Fuzzing Research Track Songyan Ji Harbin Institute of Technology, Jian Dong Harbin Institute of Technology, Jin Wu , Lishi Lu Harbin Institute of Technology | ||
10:46 11mTalk | How Developers Implement Property-Based Tests New Ideas and Emerging Results Track Arthur Corgozinho Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Henrique Rocha Loyola University Maryland, USA, Marco Tulio Valente Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil | ||
10:57 16mTalk | Cost Reduction on Testing Evolving Cancer Registry System Industry Track Erblin Isaku Simula Research Laboratory, and University of Oslo (UiO), Hassan Sartaj Simula Research Laboratory, Christoph Laaber Simula Research Laboratory, Tao Yue Beihang University, Shaukat Ali Simula Research Laboratory and Oslo Metropolitan University, Thomas Schwitalla Cancer Registry of Norway, Jan F. Nygård Cancer Registry of Norway Pre-print | ||
11:13 11mTalk | aNNoTest: An Annotation-based Test Generation Tool for Neural Network Programs Tool Demo Track Mohammad Rezaalipour Software Institute @ USI, Carlo A. Furia Università della Svizzera italiana (USI) | ||
11:24 16mTalk | Specification-based Test Case Generation for C++ Engineering Software Industry Track Michael Moser Software Competence Center Hagenberg GmbH, Michael Pfeiffer , Christina Piereder , Peter Hamberger , Thomas Luger , Claus Klammer | ||
11:40 11mTalk | Artisan: An Action-Based Test Carving Tool for Android Apps Tool Demo Track Alessio Gambi IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Mengzhen Li University of Minnesota, Mattia Fazzini University of Minnesota | ||
11:51 9mLive Q&A | 1:1 Q&A Research Track |
Accepted Papers
Call for Papers
Goal and Scope
The ICSME 2023 Tool Demonstration Track allows both researchers and practitioners to present and discuss software maintenance and evolution tools. We welcome submissions for tools ranging from research prototypes to industry tools. We specifically encourage submissions that accompany papers in the Research Paper Track, as well as tools whose code base and/or development process is open-source. The tool demonstration paper should focus on the tool’s architecture, implementation, and intended usage.
Review Criteria
Each submission will be reviewed by at least three members of the tool demonstration program committee. The committee will review each submission on its merits and quality.
A good tool paper should:
- fall under the topics mentioned for the ICSME 2023 research track;
- present and discuss a tool that has NOT been published before as a tool paper;
- discuss the relevance of the proposed tool to the ICSME community;
- report the motivation behind the tool, including typical usage scenarios;
- describe the tool’s novelty and how it relates to previous industrial or research efforts;
- describe the tool’s goals, requirements, architecture and explain its inner workings;
- NOT necessarily contain a (large-scale) empirical study of the tool, BUT any empirical results or user feedback are highly encouraged;
- consider the relevant literature;
- exhibit presentation quality.
Optionally, include in the abstract the URL of a 3-to-5 minute screencast, either with annotations or voice-over, that provides a concise version of the tool demo scenario. The video should be posted online (unlisted YouTube, hosted on the tool’s website, etc.).
All authors, reviewers, and organizers are expected to uphold the IEEE Code of Conduct.
Publication and Presentation
Accepted papers will be published as part of the conference proceedings. Camera-ready and presentation details will follow after notification of acceptance. At least one author of each accepted paper must register for the conference and present the paper at the conference.
How to Submit
Papers submitted to the tool demo track must not have been published elsewhere and must not be under review or submitted for review elsewhere while under consideration for ICSME 2023. The tool demo track is single-anonymous (i.e., authors will remain visible to the reviewers) to allow reporting on the tool’s history, ecosystem, community support, etc., as well as to avoid the overhead of having to manage anonymized repositories or source code.
Submissions must strictly adhere to the two-column IEEE conference proceedings format. You can find the templates here. LaTeX users should use the following configuration: \documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}. Microsoft Word users should use the US Letter format template. Papers must not exceed 5 pages, including all text, figures, appendices and references. All submissions must be in PDF and submitted online by the deadline via the ICSME 2023 conference management system; authors should choose “ICSME 2023 Tool Demonstrations Track Papers”.
Submissions that are not in compliance with the required submission format or that are out of the scope of the conference will be rejected without being reviewed. Submitted papers must comply with IEEE plagiarism policy and procedures.
Submission Link
Please use the following link: https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=icsme2023