A critical part of creating code suggestion systems is the pre-training of Large Language Models (LLMs) on vast amounts of source code and natural language text, often of questionable origin, quality, or compliance. This may contribute to the presence of bugs and vulnerabilities in code generated by LLMs. While efforts to identify bugs at or after code generation exist, it is preferable to pre-train or fine-tune LLMs on curated, high-quality, and compliant datasets. The need for vast amounts of training data necessitates that such curation be automated, minimizing human intervention.

We propose an automated source code autocuration technique that leverages the complete version history of open-source software (OSS) projects to improve the quality of training data. The proposed approach leverages the version history of all OSS projects to: (1) identify training data samples that have ever been modified, (2) detect samples that have undergone changes in at least one OSS project, and (3) pinpoint a subset of samples that include fixes for bugs or vulnerabilities. We evaluate this method using ``the Stack'' v2 dataset, comprising almost 600M code samples, and find that 17% of the code versions in the dataset have newer versions, with 17% of those representing bug fixes, including 2.36% addressing known CVEs. The clean, deduplicated version of Stack v2 still includes blobs vulnerable to 6,947 known CVEs. Furthermore, 58% of the blobs in the dataset were never modified after creation, suggesting they likely represent software with minimal or no use. Misidentified blob origins present an additional challenge, as they lead to the inclusion of non-permissively licensed code, raising serious compliance concerns.

By deploying these fixes and addressing compliance issues, the training of new models can avoid perpetuating buggy code patterns or license violations. We expect our results to inspire process improvements for automated data curation, a critical component of AI engineering, with the potential to significantly enhance the quality and reliability of outputs generated by AI tools.