Context. Positionality statements are a well-established practice in fields such as social sciences, where they enhance transparency, reflexivity, and ethical integrity by acknowledging how researchers’ identities, experiences, and perspectives may shape their work. Goal. This study aimed to investigate the understanding, usage, and potential value of positionality statements in software engineering (SE) research, particularly in studies focused on diversity and inclusion (D&I). Method. We conducted a qualitative survey targeting authors of D&I-focused studies in software engineering to explore their perspectives and practices regarding positionality. Through purposive sampling, we collected responses from 21 participants, which were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify how positionality is currently understood and applied. Findings. Our findings reveal that software engineering researchers often view positionality statements as a method for self-reflection, contextual awareness, and bias reduction, though practices vary widely. While some participants explicitly integrate positionality statements into their research, most apply these concepts implicitly. Challenges, such as double-anonymity requirements and the perception of objectivity in SE, also limit the adoption of positionality. Discussions. Our findings highlight an opportunity for software engineering to adopt and adapt positionality statements to reflect the field’s unique intersection of technical and human considerations. By incorporating structured positionality practices, SE research could enhance inclusivity, ethical rigor, and transparency, moving closer to the standards established in more mature disciplines. Conclusion. Although software engineering increasingly addresses complex social and human-centered issues, positionality statements have yet to become common practice in the field.