Systematizing Inclusive Design in MOSIP: An Experience Report
The GenderMag method has been successfully used by software teams to improve inclusivity in their software products across various domains. Given the success of this method, here we investigate how GenderMag can be systematically adopted in an organization. It is a conceptual replication of our prior work that identified a set of practices and pitfalls synthesized across different USA-based teams. Through Action Research, we trace the 3+ years long journey of GenderMag adoption in the MOSIP organization; starting from the initial ‘unfreeze’ stage to the institutionalization (‘re-freeze’) of GenderMag in the organization’s processes. Our findings identify: (1) which practices from the prior work could be generalized and how some of them had to be modified to fit MOSIP organization’s context (Digital Public Goods, open-source product, and fully remote work environment), and (2) the pitfalls that occurred.
Wed 30 AprDisplayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change
16:00 - 17:45 | Human and Social 1SE in Society (SEIS) / SE In Practice (SEIP) at 206 plus 208 Chair(s): Yvonne Dittrich IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark | ||
16:00 15mTalk | Systematizing Inclusive Design in MOSIP: An Experience Report SE In Practice (SEIP) Soumiki Chattopadhyay Oregon State University, Amreeta Chatterjee Oregon State University, Puja Agarwal Oregon State University, Bianca Trinkenreich Colorado State University, Swarathmika Kumar MOSIP-IIIT Bangalore, Rohit Ranjan Rai MOSIP-IIIT Bangalore, Resham Chugani MOSIP-IIIT Bangalore, Pragya Kumari MOSIP-IIIT Bangalore, Margaret Burnett Oregon State University, Anita Sarma Oregon State University Pre-print | ||
16:15 15mTalk | A Collaborative Framework for Cross-Domain Scientific Experiments for Society 5.0 SE in Society (SEIS) Muhammad Mainul Hossain University of Saskatchewan, Banani Roy University of Saskatchewan, Chanchal K. Roy University of Saskatchewan, Kevin Schneider University of Saskatchewan | ||
16:30 15mTalk | A First Look at AI Trends in Value-Aligned Software Engineering Publications: Human-LLM Insights SE in Society (SEIS) Ahmad Azarnik Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Davoud Mougouei , Mahdi Fahmideh University of Southern Queensland, Elahe Mougouei Islamic Azad University Najafabad, Hoa Khanh Dam University of Wollongong, Arif Ali Khan University of Oulu, Saima Rafi Edinburgh Napier University, Javed Ali Khan University of Hertforshire Hertfordshire, UK, Aakash Ahmad School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany Link to publication | ||
16:45 15mTalk | From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits? SE in Society (SEIS) Gianmario Voria University of Salerno, Stefano Lambiase University of Salerno, Maria Concetta Schiavone University of Salerno, Gemma Catolino University of Salerno, Fabio Palomba University of Salerno Pre-print | ||
17:00 15mTalk | Not real or too soft? On the challenges of publishing interdisciplinary software engineering research SE in Society (SEIS) Sonja Hyrynsalmi LUT University, Grischa Liebel Reykjavik University, Ronnie de Souza Santos University of Calgary, Sebastian Baltes University of Bayreuth Pre-print | ||
17:15 15mTalk | What is unethical about software? User perceptions in the Netherlands SE in Society (SEIS) Yagil Elias Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Tom P Humbert Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Lauren Olson Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Emitzá Guzmán Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Pre-print | ||